Skip to main content
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: ASK ABOUT GRANT-ALIGNED PRICING
The SecureJusticeAI Manifesto

Intelligence. Governance. Security.

Four specialists. One contract. 90-day deployment. Built for nonprofit legal services — not retrofitted from Big Law.

Published by SecureJusticeAI Consortium  ·  Updated June 2026

92% of civil legal problems go unmet LSC 2024
47% of nonprofit legal orgs have zero dedicated tech staff NY TECH 2025
$5.13M average cost of a ransomware attack FTI/Relativity 2025
90 Days from signed agreement to fully operational AI SecureJusticeAI guarantee

Sources: Legal Services Corporation Justice Gap Report (LSC 2024); FTI Consulting / Relativity Cybersecurity Report (2025); New York Legal Technology Study (NY TECH 2025); SecureJusticeAI Market Viability Study, March 2026.

I. The Declaration

Technology is not neutral.

In the hands of a nonprofit legal organization holding data for domestic violence survivors, undocumented immigrants, and low-income families fighting eviction — AI deployed without governance is not a risk to manage. It is a betrayal of the people you were built to serve.

"We assembled because the justice gap has become, in part, a technology crisis. No single vendor built this for nonprofit legal services. No single vendor had the depth to build it right. We did."

We are SecureJusticeAI. We are four independent specialists — in AI strategy, AI governance, zero trust cybersecurity, and IT infrastructure — who assembled because the justice gap has become, in part, a technology crisis. No single vendor built this for nonprofit legal services. No single vendor had the depth to build it right. We did.

We deliver Intelligence. Governance. Security. — integrated, deployed in 90 days, governed from day one.

AI is a tool. Humans drive. Governance protects the people at the bottom of every system — the ones who cannot afford to absorb an error in someone else's deployment decision.

This is not a technology pitch. It is a declaration of how this work must be done.

II. What We See

The civil legal system is failing the people it was built to serve.

And technology is not the cause. It is the unmissed opportunity.

Ninety-two percent of civil legal problems faced by low-income Americans go unmet. Legal aid organizations are the last line of defense for people fighting eviction, fleeing domestic violence, and navigating immigration systems — and they are operating with 1990s infrastructure.

47% of nonprofit legal organizations have zero dedicated technology staff.
73% have less than one full-time technology employee.
51% still store client data on on-site servers.
9% have no firewalls protecting client data whatsoever.

Meanwhile, the legal technology environment is escalating around them:

  • 87% of general counsel are now using generative AI — most of it unmanaged.
  • A February 2026 federal court ruling confirmed that AI-generated documents are NOT protected by attorney-client privilege when created without documented safeguards.
  • ABA Formal Opinion 512 requires exactly those safeguards — and most legal aid organizations have none.
  • Ransomware attacks targeting legal organizations increased 58% in 2025. The average cost: $5.13 million.

The organizations without governance frameworks, cybersecurity architecture, and human-in-the-loop standards are not waiting for the crisis to arrive. They are in it. Their attorneys are burning out triaging administrative work that AI should be doing. Their client data is exposed. Their boards are asking questions no one can answer.

The justice gap is not only a resource gap. It is a technology and governance gap — and it has a solution.

III. What We Believe

Six principles that govern everything we build.

  1. 01
    AI without governance is a liability.

    Every agent that touches client data must be governed, audited, and explainable to a funder before it touches a single file.

  2. 02
    Security is not optional when the data includes domestic violence victims and undocumented immigrants.

    Prevention-first. Not just detection.

  3. 03
    The justice gap cannot be closed with 1990s infrastructure.

    Attorneys should spend their time on legal work — not administrative triage, manual document review, or repeated data entry.

  4. 04
    Speed without governance is recklessness at nonprofit pricing.

    The urgency is real. ABA Opinion 512, the February 2026 federal ruling, and state-level AI regulations are creating a compliance clock. But urgency without conscience is how vulnerable people get hurt at speed.

  5. 05
    Four deep specialists beat one generalist vendor.

    One company trying to cover AI, security, governance, and IT produces generalist knowledge and specialized liability. Our four-partner structure means every gap is covered by someone who has spent a career closing it.

  6. 06
    Governance is not bureaucracy.

    It is protection for the clients your organization was built to serve. The measure of any AI implementation is not what it does for the organization. It is what it does to the most vulnerable human the organization serves.

IV. What We Build

Four pillars. One integrated system. Governed from day one.

The SecureJusticeAI platform is built on four pillars, delivered as one integrated system, governed from day one.

Consortium Lead

Founder & Principal Strategist, Executive Director of Strategy & Partnerships

Richard Schreiber / Law Firm AI Expert | TrialLift

Founder & Principal Strategist, Executive Director of Strategy & Partnerships. Richard manages every client engagement end-to-end — from the Clarity Audit through full deployment. Custom AI agents, TrialLift citation validation, and single-point accountability for every SecureJusticeAI client relationship.

Pillar 2 · Governance

AI Governance & Compliance

Chris Feamster / Cognify Solutions

Responsible AI frameworks. Guardrails embedded in every agent before it touches client data. ABA Formal Opinion 512 compliance. ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF alignment. Funder-defensible. Board-presentable. Ongoing ethical compliance monitoring.

Pillar 3 · Security

Zero Trust Cybersecurity

Tony Chiappetta / CHIPS Cyber Defense

Zero Trust architecture deployed in Phase 1, before any AI agent is built. AppGuard endpoint protection. Ransomware prevention — not just detection. Law enforcement-grade threat intelligence. Privilege-preserving security protocols.

Pillar 4 · IT Integration & AI Solutions

Chief AI Strategist & Solutions Architect

Clyde Brown / TechBridge Unlimited

Autonomous Agentic RAG pipeline architecture. LLM fine-tuning for legal use cases. Azure and Microsoft 365 infrastructure. Bias-mitigated AI systems for highly regulated environments. Legacy system modernization. Scalable infrastructure design.

One contract. One client relationship. One 90-day deployment commitment. Four specialists who do this every day.

The 90-Day Transformation

From signed agreement to fully operational AI — three phases, four specialists, one governance framework.

Days 1–30

Secure the Foundation

Zero Trust deployed. M365/Google hardened. AppGuard active. Governance framework documented.

✓ Deliverable: AI-ready and secure.
Days 31–60

Build & Deploy

Custom AI agents built. Guardrails embedded before any agent touches client data. Staff trained and certified.

✓ Deliverable: Intake automated, research faster, documents drafted.
Day 90

Go-Live

Attorneys doing legal work, not admin triage. Compliance monitoring active. Phase 2 planning begins.

✓ Deliverable: Measurable ROI documented for funders and board.
V. Who This Is For

Organizations doing the right thing — who need infrastructure that matches the stakes.

The Managing Attorney

At an urban legal aid organization with 35 staff, no dedicated IT, a client base that includes domestic violence survivors and undocumented immigrants, a board asking about AI at every meeting, and a grant cycle that does not forgive a ransomware attack. She does not need theory. She needs a 90-day roadmap and a partner who has been in the room.

The Executive Director

Whose funders are now asking about AI readiness and cybersecurity posture in every grant report. He needs governance documentation that is defensible, explainable, and does not require a law degree to present to a board.

The Legal Aid Technology Director

Who has been fighting for budget against grant constraints, managing legacy systems, and trying to implement AI governance with no vendor who understands the specific privilege and confidentiality requirements of legal services work.

The Public Defender Office Administrator

Whose attorneys are drowning in case volume, whose data includes the most sensitive information in any legal context, and whose technology budget is a fraction of what commercial firms spend per attorney.

None of them need another vendor who performs urgency and delivers a solution designed to create dependency. They need infrastructure they can operate, governance they can explain to a funder, and a consortium that built this specifically for them — not retrofitted from Big Law.
The Consortium

Four Specialists. Four Careers. One Client.

Every SecureJusticeAI engagement is formally governed by the Consortium Partner Agreement — all four partners are accountable to every client.

Consortium Lead

Richard Schreiber

Founder & Principal Strategist, Executive Director of Strategy & Partnerships | Law Firm AI Expert | TrialLift
  • Custom AI agents for legal workflows
  • TrialLift citation validation & hallucination prevention
  • Client engagement management — single point of accountability
  • ROI documentation for every engagement
Governance

Chris Feamster

Cognify Solutions · Chief Governance Officer
  • ABA Formal Opinion 512 compliance
  • ISO/IEC 42001 & NIST AI RMF alignment
  • Funder-defensible governance frameworks
  • Ongoing ethical compliance monitoring
Security

Tony Chiappetta

CHIPS Cyber Defense · Chief Security Officer
  • Zero Trust architecture deployment
  • AppGuard endpoint protection
  • Ransomware prevention — not just detection
  • Law enforcement-grade threat intelligence
IT Integration & AI Solutions

Clyde Brown

TechBridge Unlimited · Chief AI Strategist & Solutions Architect
  • Autonomous Agentic RAG pipeline architecture
  • LLM fine-tuning for legal use cases
  • Azure infrastructure & Microsoft 365 hardening
  • Bias-mitigated AI in regulated environments
Frequently Asked Questions

What You Need to Know

SecureJusticeAI is a four-partner consortium delivering integrated AI strategy, governance, cybersecurity, and IT infrastructure exclusively for nonprofit legal services organizations. The four partners cover AI strategy and custom agents (Richard Schreiber / TrialLift), AI governance and ABA 512 compliance (Chris Feamster / Cognify Solutions), Zero Trust cybersecurity and ransomware prevention (Tony Chiappetta / CHIPS Cyber Defense), and IT integration and agentic pipeline architecture (Clyde Brown / TechBridge Unlimited). The full platform is deployed in 90 days.
Nonprofit legal organizations hold some of the most sensitive data in any legal context — data for domestic violence survivors, undocumented immigrants, and low-income families. A February 2026 federal court ruling confirmed that AI-generated documents are not protected by attorney-client privilege when created without documented safeguards. ABA Formal Opinion 512 requires attorneys to have documented AI oversight processes. Without governance built specifically for legal services requirements, organizations face privilege loss, regulatory exposure, and funder accountability gaps.
SecureJusticeAI delivers a fully operational AI and cybersecurity platform in three phases: Days 1–30 secure the foundation (Zero Trust architecture, Microsoft 365 hardening, governance framework documented). Days 31–60 build and deploy custom AI agents with guardrails embedded before any agent touches client data. Day 90 is go-live, with measurable ROI documented for funders and board. All four consortium partners are formally accountable to every client under the SecureJusticeAI Consortium Partner Agreement.
The Clarity Audit is the entry point for every SecureJusticeAI engagement. It is a structured assessment of an organization's current AI readiness, cybersecurity posture, and technology infrastructure — completed in approximately two weeks. Starting at $2,500, the Clarity Audit fee is fully credited toward the full SecureJusticeAI engagement. Organizations leave the audit with a 90-day roadmap and a clear picture of their exposure and opportunity.
Harvey AI, CoCounsel, Spellbook, and similar platforms offer AI workflow tools but provide no AI governance, no cybersecurity, no IT infrastructure, and no integration specifically designed for nonprofit legal services. Assembling equivalent capabilities from separate vendors costs $4,390 to $6,750 per month for a 10-person legal department. SecureJusticeAI delivers all four capabilities as one integrated platform, under one contract. It is the only consortium built exclusively for nonprofit legal services — not retrofitted from Big Law.
The SecureJusticeAI Manifesto is the founding declaration of the consortium — a statement of what we see in the nonprofit legal services sector, what we believe about AI governance and cybersecurity, what we build, and who we build it for. It establishes our position: that the justice gap is now a technology and governance gap, that AI without governance is a liability for the organizations least able to absorb one, and that four deep specialists coordinated under one governance agreement can close that gap in 90 days.

Your Next Step

Book Your Clarity Audit

A structured assessment of your AI readiness, cybersecurity posture, and technology infrastructure — completed in two weeks. Starting at $2,500, fully credited toward your full engagement. Leave with a 90-day roadmap and a clear picture of your exposure and opportunity.

Book Your Clarity Audit →

No obligation. The audit fee is credited toward your full SecureJusticeAI engagement.